Change agents work around the clock creating words, phrases and memes that disrupt our mental processes. This allows government, politicians and nongovernmental organizations working on behalf of government public policy to mask their agendas and create illusions so they can deceive the people and misrepresent their deeds.
Governments, bureaucrats and politicians look upon the public as a herd that should be deceived and led for the benefit of government and the elite. Everything they do, every policy they enact is for the benefit of the state or to grow their power or for their self-aggrandizement.
Edward L. Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud, is the father of manipulative propaganda in America. Mass persuasion and mass hypnosis is the foundation of so-called democracy.
In his book, “Propaganda,” Bernays writes:
Those who manipulate the unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of.
In almost every act of our lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business or in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind.
It is this propaganda that forms the basis of conventional wisdom. Conventional wisdom is what most people believe. Conventional wisdom is melded into our psyches by the news media, public schools, the medical establishment, churches and the government. It’s a lifetime programming process that builds parameters of thought from which few can escape.
The terms “women’s health” and “abortion” are such conventional wisdom control phrases. Women’s health provides cover for abortion, and abortion is simply a cover word for murder. If every preacher in the land would do his duty for truth and life, he would call abortion what it is: the murder of children.
The series of videos recently released showing Planned Parenthood officials bartering baby parts — and now we know even “a baby” as they admit — as cavalierly as if they were junk store bric-a-brac has partially unveiled the vile, horrendous nature and absolute inhuman barbarism of the abortion industry and its practitioners, which had been hidden under a false veneer of “women’s health” and “women’s choice.”
In 1935, the American Eugenics Society’s dogma held that eugenics was a “racial preventive medicine” that sought to remove “degenerates” that were an “insidious disease” affecting the societal body in a similar manner to a cancer in the human body.
Or as Konrad Lorenz, Nobel Laureate in Medicine and later a psychologist with the Nazi Germany’s Office of Racial Policy put it:
There is a close analogy between a human body invaded by a cancer and a nation afflicted with subpopulations whose inborn defects cause them to become social liabilities. Just as in cancer the best treatment is to eradicate the parasitic growth as quickly as possible, the eugenic defense against the dysgenic social effects of afflicted subpopulations is of necessity limited to equally drastic measures…. When these inferior elements are not effectively eliminated from a (healthy) population, then — just as when the cells of a malignant tumor are allowed to proliferate throughout a human body — they destroy the host body as well as themselves.
These “degenerates” were not only the “inferior races” (that is the nonwhites), but also the “two million (in 1935) ‘feebleminded’ persons in the United States in need of institutional care and 150,000 epileptics (90,000 were actually institutionalized). Another 320,006 persons were institutionalized for insanity.” [i] These people were afflicted with “defects” that eugenicists believed made them a drain on society.
An American Eugenics Society publication, “Tomorrow’s Children,” states:
“[S]uch defects are sometimes ‘purely environmental in origin.’ Nevertheless, such people are always in danger of reproducing defective children. After all, what kind of home influence can one expect where either parent is epileptic, feeble-minded, or insane?”
But no matter what the cause of such defects might be, “even if all the criminals, epileptics and similar people were biologically desirable, their homes are rarely desirable places in which to bring up children.” Common prudence “makes it advisable that even the doubtful cases should have no children.” Furthermore, Tomorrow’s Children estimated that about five million adults and six million children were “subnormal in education” and suffered from “lack of innate ability.” Another twenty million others failed to finish grammar school. Some of these, of course, could have finished with better health care or school programs designed to their needs. Nevertheless, there “seems no escape from the conclusion that many of them inherit such a poor mental endowment that even this moderate degree of success is beyond their ability.” [ii]
The American Eugenic Society, which had helped push sterilization laws through in as many as 30 states in the early 20th century, was a staunch proponent of the Nazi Germany sterilization program in 1937. The organization’s secretary, Frederick Osborne, noted: “Taken altogether, recent developments in Germany constitute perhaps the most important social experiment that has ever been tried.” American and German eugenicists were so ideologically close that they regularly translated and shared each other’s literature.
The Nazi eugenic sterilization program Osborne was lauding mandated the sterilization of people with disabilities deemed heritable. Those “disabilities” included being a human of “worthless” or “inferior” value in hereditary terms. Eugenics was synonymous with “race hygiene,” and its most fundamental program was to purify the race by eliminating “low grade” and “degenerate” groups. This created in America and Germany a generic racism and sexism. Not surprisingly, the victims always turned out to be the traditional victims of racism: Jews, blacks, women and the poor.[iii]
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a longtime sponsor and board member of the American Eugenics Society. She used the wealth of her husband Noah Slee’s 3-In-One Oil company fortune to promote eugenics and grow Planned Parenthood. Sanger, in a 1925 essay titled “The Need of Birth Control in America,” wrote:
Such human weeds [defined by her in published writings alternately as morons/defectives, delinquents/misfits/the maladjusted, and dependents/the poor] clog up the path, drain up the energies and the resources of this little earth. We must clear the way for a better world, we must cultivate our garden.
To “clear the way” Sanger wanted to segregate and neuter those deemed by her and society to be racially or socially undesirable. [iv]
Planned Parenthood has continued with this path to this day. Two reportshave found that Planned Parenthood places its abortion clinics near neighborhoods with inordinately high numbers of blacks and Hispanics. The Cincinnati-based Life Issues Institute determined that 79 percent of the organization’s surgical abortion facilities are within walking distance of predominately black or Hispanic neighborhoods.
Also, The Protecting Black Lives report, citing data from the Alan Guttmacher Institute, which is the research arm of Planned Parenthood, cited data showing that in 2008, 30 percent of the 1.2 million abortions performed were of black children even though blacks make up only 12.6 percent of the U.S. population. This makes abortion the top cause of death among blacks, higher than all other causes combined. Last year in New York, more black babies were aborted than were born.
The aforementioned Planned Parenthood secretary Osborne, speaking in 1973 on the reason for changing the name of the American Eugenics Society to The Society for the Study of Social Biology after the Roe v. Wadedecision said: “The name was changed because it became evident that changes of a eugenic nature would be made for reasons other than eugenics, and that tying a eugenic label on them would more often hinder than help their adoption. Birth control and abortion are turning out to be great eugenic advances of our time.” [emphasis added]
The language used has not changed, nor have the arguments in support of it. Abortionistas and their defenders and proponents claim that soon-to-be-born humans are just “tissues” like cancers or bad kidneys or are “parasitic growths” that need to be excised from the woman’s body. But these “tissues” are not at all like cancers or bad kidneys because they contain hearts, livers, kidneys, brains, etc., that Planned Parenthood is harvesting for sale. This moral relativism, of course, provides cover for the fact that a cancer or kidney or parasite will never be able to survive outside the body, but the human baby will be able to in a matter of weeks.
The abortionistas and their defenders and proponents lament that the baby may be “defective” or born to poor or abusive parents, or it won’t be properly cared for or properly educated (feeble-minded) and would, therefore, be a “drain on society” or possibly produce more progeny that would likewise be feeble-minded, so it would be “better off” if were sucked out of the womb and chopped up and bartered for Lamborghinis. After all, who could couch such a thing as a youngster being born to “inferiors” or growing up in the company of “inferiors” and possibly producing more “inferior” offspring. Besides, those parts could better serve humanity through research. Such was the thought process of the early 20th century American eugenicists and Nazi eugenicists, and such is the thought process of the modern-day eugenicists (all abortion defenders, whether they admit it or not).
While some people are alarmed or appalled by what the Planned Parenthood videos have revealed, few would ever suspect the progression pattern and how these altruistic social expressions finally evolve into law. This means in plain language that at some point, the government decides “by law” who is to die “in the public interest” as in Nazi Germany.
They will decide which children will die. Eventually they will decide which aged and infirm will die via Obamacare death panels. And finally, they will come after you with no pretense.
By the time murder laws are enacted, the people will have been prepared to accept them as desirable and “for the good of the country” and the community. Then we reach the stage of Orwell’s Animal Farm. Legalized abortion (murder) and population control (forced sterilization), even if they were not moral issues, are inconsistent with human liberty and natural law.
The hope is that these videos have sufficiently shocked America back into its moral senses and the outrage over this American holocaust of 58 million babies since Roe v. Wade — 17 million of them black babies — will peel back the façade of the control phrases, much like the liberation of concentration camps did to expose the horrors of Adolf Hitler’s Final Solution, which was instituted in stages beginning with the sterilization of “inferiors.” The videos reveal the abortion industry for what it is: the holocaust of American children that makes the World War II Jewish Holocaust (5 million to 6 million) like playing in the JV league.
By the way, there is a very solid economic reason why unofficial “public policy” wants to limit population through abortion and sterilization programs and also wants you to expire when you retire. Too much medical consumption and too many aging people constitute a real and present “medical crisis” for the government.
The term “medical crisis” is a code word for excessive public consumption. The unofficial and unstated long-range “public policy” is “women’s choice” (baby murder) and “assisted suicide” (euthanasia).
It may not be official or stated, but you can be sure that population control to limit consumption is a serious government policy and program. As more and more consumption flows to an aging and sick population, the transfer of real resources reverses to these population segments. The tail begins to wag the dog. The economic system was designed to transfer real resources to the government. In addition to a racist agenda, there is an economic agenda behind the so-called “medical crisis” and eugenics.