Any Day Now Blog

Blog Grid2023-04-25T16:14:51-05:00

58 Million Killed

Source: 58 Million Killed

Abortion Is Violence

On this day forty-three years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decidedRoe v. Wade, declaring that an unborn child was not a legal “person” and thus possessed no rights under our Constitution, including the most fundamental right: the right to life.

This decision has not only resulted in the destruction of countless innocent human lives (we include here both victims of abortion: the mother and her child), it also began the destruction of our Constitution.

In Roe, the Court held that it was a constitutional “right” to kill an unborn child by abortion.

As a result, since Roe v. Wade, more than 58 million innocent children have been killed by abortion.

This fateful decision and its consequences continue to tear at the soul of America.   We know in our collective heart as Americans that killing an innocent, unborn child—the most vulnerable in our society—is immoral and can never be right.

As St. Thomas Aquinas observed, any law that is contrary to God’s law is no law at all—it is violence.  Make no mistake: abortion is violence.

We can assure you that the American Freedom Law Center is committed to defending the right to life.  And we are committed to defending those who speak out against abortion—the many who provide the needed voice for those who suffer in silence in the name of “choice.”

Please take a moment today to pray for an end to abortion.

May God bless you, and may God bless America.

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=3e52ed38f7d08a87b0d892f46&id=062841b54e&e=9b8ad2e1f2

Jury-nullification activist delivers in-your-face defense

Constitution

Jury-nullification activist delivers in-your-face defense

A Michigan man charged with felony obstruction of justice and jury tampering for handing out a leaflet on jury nullification in front of a courthouse contends the local prosecutor’s objection to the contents of his material doesn’t make his actions a crime. Keith Wood, a former pastor, was arrested Nov. 24 on the orders of Mecosta… (more…)

“A nation that kills its children has no future.” (Pray for Mercy)

From the Desk of Richard Thompson

Today marks the 43rd anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s infamous 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade.  In this decision, 7 unelected judges, holding lifetime appointments, created out of thin air a constitutional right for women to kill the innocent children in their wombs.  Thus far, 58 million innocent babies have been killed.

The annual March for Life held in Washington DC is unique in our nation’s history.  There is no other event where more than half a million people annually gather in our nation’s capital to protest a Supreme Court decision.

Why is it taking so long to overturn Roe v. Wade?

Many legal scholars, even those sympathetic to abortion rights, acknowledged that Roe v. Wade was not based on any precedent.

“What is frightening about Roe is that this super-protected right is not inferable from the language of the Constitution, the framers’ thinking respecting the specific problem in issue, any general value derivable from the provisions they included, or the nation’s governmental structure.”

— John Hart Ely, Yale Law Professor

“One of the most curious things about Roe is that, behind its own verbal smokescreen, the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found.”

— Laurence H. Tribe, Harvard Law Professor

“As a matter of constitutional interpretation and judicial method, Roe borders on the indefensible. I say this as someone utterly committed to the right to choose. … Justice Blackmun’s opinion provides essentially no reasoning in support of its holding.”

— Edward Lazarus, former clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun

“[I]t is time to admit in public that, as an example of the practice of constitutional opinion writing, Roe is a serious disappointment. You will be hard-pressed to find a constitutional law professor, even among those who support the idea of constitutional protection for the right to choose, who will embrace the opinion itself rather than the result. This is not surprising. As a constitutional argument, Roe is barely coherent. The court pulled its fundamental right to choose more or less from the constitutional ether.”

— Kermit Roosevelt, University of Pennsylvania Law Professor

“Judges have no special competence, qualifications, or mandate to decide between equally compelling moral claims (as in the abortion controversy). … [C]lear governing constitutional principles … are not present [in Roe].”

— Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law Professor

“[O]verturning [Roe] would be the best thing that could happen to the federal judiciary. … Thirty years after Roe, the finest constitutional minds in the country still have not been able to produce a constitutional justification for striking down restrictions on early-term abortions that is substantially more convincing than Justice Harry Blackmun’s famously artless opinion itself.”

— Jeffrey Rosen, George Washington University Law Professor

The fact that Pro-Life advocates still have to struggle to overturn Roe 43 years later is especially egregious when compared to how quickly the Supreme Court has reversed its decisions regarding homosexuality.

In 1986, the Supreme Court held that there was no constitutional right to engage in homosexual activity (Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186).  Just seventeen years later, in 2003, the Court overturned that ruling and held all anti-sodomy laws were unconstitutional (Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558). Just twelve years later, in 2015, the Court declared same-sex marriage a constitutional right (Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2588).

I deeply appreciate the unheralded sacrifices of the many people fighting on behalf of the unborn: those who participate in today’s March for Life; those who sacrifice their time as sidewalk counselors in front of Planned Parenthood facilities regardless of the weather, taunts from passersby, and harassment from clinic employees and the police; pregnancy help centers;  respect for life committees; the many national Pro-Life organizations; and the people who pray this holocaust will end.

I want to specially mention the courageous actions of young students who wear their Pro-Life t-shirts to school, often in the face of unfriendly school officials and threats of discipline.

Our nation must be mindful of God’s ultimate justice as He beholds the faces of the millions of aborted children – the greatest among us – killed according to our laws.  We should all tremble with fear knowing “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”

http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=adf1a83154acea60d091b413c&id=af035c6baf&e=c2f5b12e6b

March for Life: Changing minds, changing hearts. Not seen via Enemedia.

March for Life: Changing minds, changing hearts

 

Friday, January 22, 2016

|

Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

March for Life crowdSeveral hundred thousand people are in Washington, DC, today for the annual March for Life event. Americans are being asked to remember that African-Americans are special targets for abortion.

National and state lawmakers continue to press for legislation to limit abortion, set health and safety standards for abortuaries, and work to end abortion completely. Clenard H. Childress, Jr. of the Life, Education and Resource Network (LEARN), tells OneNewsNow that’s laudable, but progress really should be measured by changing hearts one at a time.

Americans favor restrictions on abortion

There’s more evidence that even those Americans who support abortion are listening to and responding to the pro-life message.

Knights of Columbus commissioned a Marist Poll as they do each year at this time on the subject of public acceptance of abortion. Carol Tobias of the National Right to Life Committee has taken a look at the latestpublic opinion survey.

Tobias

“Once again they found that a majority of Americans – an overwhelming majority of Americans – do not support the way abortion is practiced in this country today where unborn children can be killed by abortion up through the ninth month of pregnancy for any reason,” she shares.

In fact, 81 percent of Americans said it should be limited to the first trimester of pregnancy; and 77 percent agreed that pro-life laws protect both the child and mother.

Tobias notes that even those who support abortion believe there should be limits. She lists several.

“Time limit – that abortion should be limited to the first couple of months of pregnancy; or they think abortion should be prohibited when the unborn child has reached that stage of development where she can feel pain,” says the pro-life leader.

“They don’t think tax dollars should be used to pay for abortion. They would think that parents should be notified before their minor daughter can get an abortion.”

And that, she argues, sends a message to politicians seeking office. Tobias says Democrats tend to support abortion on demand, but won’t say it on the campaign trail because the view of the strong majority of Americans has changed.

“Really this has to be a people thing,” he says. “We have to take our own values into the public square and demand the rights of the unborn be adhered to, and also that the criminal activity of Planned Parenthood cease and certainly that no taxpayer dollars should be funding them.”

While marching in the pro-life demonstration at the capitol, Childress hopes the American people will be mindful that the black population is a special target in abortion operations, including those by Planned Parenthood.

“African Americans make up 12.4 percent of the population of the country, yet account for 36 percent of abortions – and that’s according to Alan Guttmacher and also the Census Bureau,” he says. The Alan Guttmacher Institute is the independent research arm of the International Planned Parenthood Federation.

In order to reduce or eliminate that figure, Childress is calling on African-American pastors to understand that black genocide is occurring through abortion, then preach and teach against abortion in the church and in the wider community.

On the other side of the country

Various cities throughout the country hold their own annual March for Life events for those who cannot make it to Washington for the national march to the Supreme Court. The largest outside Washington is the “Walk for Life West Coast” held in San Francisco on Saturday.

Spokesperson Delores Meehan was asked how many people they expect to march down Market Street. “It’s somewhere between 50,000 and 60,000,” she replies, adding that over the march’s 12-year life span the number of participants has grown from about 7,500 the first year.

Meehan says the total numbers aren’t as important as the demographics of the marchers themselves, which show more and more young people participating. “And this year there’s been a very special focus on outreach to our local high schools,” she notes. “It’s really exciting to have our own youth and really how the cultural landscape of San Francisco will change with their enthusiasm.”

According to the West Coast march spokesperson, those young pro-life activists are increasingly forming pro-life clubs in their schools and helping to educate other young people on the issues. Los Angeles and San Diego have also launched Walk for Life events; and one is planned for Spokane, Washington.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/pro-life/2016/01/22/march-for-life-changing-minds-changing-hearts?utm_source=OneNewsNow&utm_medium=email&utm_term=16782880&utm_content=474732033809&utm_campaign=23330

Elites pouring billions into gene-therapy research

genetic_mutation

Elites pouring billions into gene-therapy research

Scientists have been quietly working for decades to crack the genetic codes that allow humans to live forever, or at least significantly longer. And judging by the bits of information that are beginning to leak into the mainstream of human discourse, the idea may no longer be far-fetched. Stuart Kim, a genetics professor at Stanford University,… (more…)

Op-Ed: If Israel Goes, We All Go – A7 Exclusive Features – News – Arutz Sheva

 

gog-and-magog1

Opinion: ‘If Israel Goes Down, We All Go Down‘

In an op-ed in the London Times, former Spanish Prime Minister José María Aznar writes, “Israel is our first line of defense” against

By José María Aznar
First Publish: 6/20/2010, 6:41 AM / Last Update: 6/20/2010, 6:32 AM

 The following op-ed, by the former Prime Minister of Spain,  originally appeared in The London Times.

For far too long now it has been unfashionable in Europe to speak up for Israel. In the wake of the recent incident on board a ship full of anti-Israeli activists in the Mediterranean, it is hard to think of a more unpopular cause to champion. In an ideal world, the assault by Israeli commandos on the Mavi Marmara would not have ended up with nine dead and a score wounded. In an ideal world, the soldiers would have been peacefully welcomed on to the ship. In an ideal world, no state, let alone a recent ally of Israel such as Turkey, would have sponsored and organized a flotilla whose sole purpose was to create an impossible situation for Israel: making it choose between giving up its security policy and the naval blockade, or risking the wrath of the world.

In our dealings with Israel, we must blow away the red mists of anger that too often cloud our judgment. A reasonable and balanced approach should encapsulate the following realities: first, the state of Israel was created by a decision of the UN. Its legitimacy, therefore, should not be in question. Israel is a nation with deeply rooted democratic institutions. It is a dynamic and open society that has repeatedly excelled in culture, science and technology.

Second, owing to its roots, history, and values, Israel is a fully fledged Western nation. Indeed, it is a normal Western nation, but one confronted by abnormal circumstances.

Uniquely in the West, it is the only democracy whose very existence has been questioned since its inception. In the first instance, it was attacked by its neighbors using the conventional weapons of war. Then it faced terrorism culminating in wave after wave of suicide attacks. Now, at the behest of radical Islamists and their sympathizers, it faces a campaign of delegitimisation through international law and diplomacy.

Sixty-two years after its creation, Israel is still fighting for its very survival. Punished with missiles raining from north and south, threatened with destruction by an Iran aiming to acquire nuclear weapons and pressed upon by friend and foe, Israel, it seems, is never to have a moment’s peace.

For years, the focus of Western attention has understandably been on the peace process between Israelis and Palestinians. But if Israel is in danger today and the whole region is slipping towards a worryingly problematic future, it is not due to the lack of understanding between the parties on how to solve this conflict. The parameters of any prospective peace agreement are clear, however difficult it may seem for the two sides to make the final push for a settlement.

Radical Islamism is the real threat
The real threats to regional stability, however, are to be found in the rise of a radical Islamism which sees Israel’s destruction as the fulfillment of its religious destiny and, simultaneously in the case of Iran, as an expression of its ambitions for regional hegemony. Both phenomena are threats that affect not only Israel, but also the wider West and the world at large.

The core of the problem lies in the ambiguous and often erroneous manner in which too many Western countries are now reacting to this situation. It is easy to blame Israel for all the evils in the Middle East. Some even act and talk as if a new understanding with the Muslim world could be achieved if only we were prepared to sacrifice the Jewish state on the altar. This would be folly.

Israel is our first line of defense in a turbulent region that is constantly at risk of descending into chaos; a region vital to our energy security owing to our overdependence on Middle Eastern oil; a region that forms the front line in the fight against extremism. If Israel goes down, we all go down. To defend Israel’s right to exist in peace, within secure borders, requires a degree of moral and strategic clarity that too often seems to have disappeared in Europe. The United States shows worrying signs of heading in the same direction.

The West is going through a period of confusion over the shape of the world’s future. To a great extent, this confusion is caused by a kind of masochistic self-doubt over our own identity; by the rule of political correctness; by a multiculturalism that forces us to our knees before others; and by a secularism which, irony of ironies, blinds us even when we are confronted by jihadis promoting the most fanatical incarnation of their faith. To abandon Israel to its fate, at this moment of all moments, would merely serve to illustrate how far we have sunk and how inexorable our decline now appears.

This cannot be allowed to happen. Motivated by the need to rebuild our own Western values, expressing deep concern about the wave of aggression against Israel, and mindful that Israel’s strength is our strength and Israel’s weakness is our weakness, I have decided to promote a new Friends of Israel initiative with the help of some prominent people, including David Trimble, Andrew Roberts, John Bolton, Alejandro Toledo (the former President of Peru), Marcello Pera (philosopher and former President of the Italian Senate), Fiamma Nirenstein (the Italian author and politician), the financier Robert Agostinelli and the Catholic intellectual George Weigel.

It is not our intention to defend any specific policy or any particular Israeli government. The sponsors of this initiative are certain to disagree at times with decisions taken by Jerusalem. We are democrats, and we believe in diversity.

What binds us, however, is our unyielding support for Israel’s right to exist and to defend itself. For Western countries to side with those who question Israel’s legitimacy, for them to play games in international bodies with Israel’s vital security issues, for them to appease those who oppose Western values rather than robustly to stand up in defense of those values, is not only a grave moral mistake, but a strategic error of the first magnitude.

Israel is a fundamental part of the West. The West is what it is thanks to its Judeo-Christian roots. If the Jewish element of those roots is upturned and Israel is lost, then we are lost too. Whether we like it or not, our fate is inextricably intertwined.

José María Aznar was prime minister of Spain between 1996 and 2004.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/138149#.VqEXeiorKhc

‘Dead white guys did not create this country’

classroom

‘Dead white guys did not create this country’

Stating flatly, “Dead white guys did not create this country,” an executive in the American school textbook industry has been captured on undercover video confirming Common Core pushes an elitist, progressive agenda of global warming, gun control and other liberal-left positions on America’s children. The investigation by James O’KeefeProject Veritas features Kimberly Koerber, a former manager… (more…)

Go to Top